🔗 Share this article

Avril Coleridge-Taylor always bore the burden of her parent’s legacy. As the daughter of the renowned Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English artists of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s identity was cloaked in the deep shadows of the past.

The First Recording

Not long ago, I contemplated these memories as I got ready to produce the world premiere recording of Avril’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Featuring emotional harmonies, soulful lyricism, and confident beats, Avril’s work will provide audiences valuable perspective into how this artist – a wartime composer originating from the early 1900s – imagined her reality as a female composer of color.

Past and Present

But here’s the thing about the past. It requires time to acclimate, to recognize outlines as they truly exist, to tell reality from misrepresentation, and I was reluctant to address Avril’s past for a period.

I deeply hoped the composer to be a reflection of her father. Partially, this was true. The pastoral English palettes of Samuel’s influence can be observed in many of her works, such as From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to review the names of her father’s compositions to understand how he heard himself as not just a standard-bearer of UK romantic tradition but a advocate of the African diaspora.

At this point Samuel and Avril began to differ.

The United States assessed the composer by the brilliance of his compositions as opposed to the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

As a student at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the child of a parent from Sierra Leone and a Caucasian parent – started to lean into his African roots. At the time the poet of color the renowned Dunbar arrived in England in 1897, the 21-year-old composer eagerly sought him out. He adapted this literary work to music and the next year used the poet’s words for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Subsequently arrived the choral composition that made him famous: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Based on this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, notably for Black Americans who felt indirect honor as American society judged Samuel by the excellence of his compositions instead of the colour of his skin.

Principles and Actions

Fame did not reduce his activism. In 1900, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in London where he met the African American intellectual the renowned Du Bois and saw a variety of discussions, including on the oppression of African people in South Africa. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He maintained ties with early civil rights leaders such as this intellectual and this leader, gave addresses on ending discrimination, and even talked about matters of race with the American leader on a trip to the presidential residence in that year. In terms of his art, the scholar reflected, “he established his reputation so prominently as a creative artist that it will endure.” He succumbed in that year, at 37 years old. Yet how might her father have made of his offspring’s move to be in South Africa in the that decade?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to South African policy,” ran a headline in the community journal Jet magazine. The system “appeared to me the appropriate course”, she informed Jet. When asked to explain, she revised her statement: she didn’t agree with this policy “fundamentally” and it “could be left to run its course, directed by well-meaning people of every background”. Were the composer more attuned to her family’s principles, or raised in Jim Crow America, she could have hesitated about the policy. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Heritage and Innocence

“I possess a English document,” she remarked, “and the officials never asked me about my race.” Thus, with her “fair” skin (as described), she traveled within European circles, lifted by their admiration for her late father. She gave a talk about her father’s music at the Cape Town university and conducted the broadcasting ensemble in the city, including the heroic third movement of her composition, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a skilled pianist personally, she never played as the lead performer in her concerto. Rather, she invariably directed as the conductor; and so the segregated ensemble performed under her direction.

Avril hoped, in her own words, she “might bring a change”. Yet in the mid-1950s, things fell apart. After authorities became aware of her mixed background, she could no longer stay the country. Her citizenship offered no defense, the UK representative advised her to leave or be jailed. She returned to England, feeling great shame as the magnitude of her inexperience became clear. “The realization was a painful one,” she expressed. Increasing her embarrassment was the printing that year of her unfortunate magazine feature, a year after her forced leaving from South Africa.

A Recurring Theme

Upon contemplating with these legacies, I sensed a familiar story. The account of holding UK citizenship until it’s revoked – one that calls to mind troops of color who defended the English throughout the global conflict and made it through but were refused rightful benefits. And the Windrush generation,