🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical content by men and women received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."